Iowa captures the wind

May 27th, 2011 by Matt Smolsky No comments »

The drive across Iowa’s nothing special. Like many places in the Midwest, the Interstate routes through the path of least resistance, so there’s not much to see except farmland.

Driving east into Des Moines a few years ago, I saw an incredible site. Dozens of massive, a couple hundred feet tall, soared out of the green and gold Iowa farmland and spun lazily on a relatively calm day. It reminded me of the massive array of wind turbines I’d seen on the big island of Hawaii a few years prior. I asked a few questions upon my arrival and learned Iowa was an early leader in capturing wind energy.

Now, Iowa gets 20% of its power form wind. According to Chris Gaul of the National Renewable Energy Lab, that’s enough to displace 6 million tons of coal a year (500 trainloads). That’s an awesome savings all because of wind. It’s with us everyday. If you live on the Great Plains (or in tornado-stricken Alabama or Missouri), you know its destructive power is swift and frequent. Thanks to Iowa, we now also know that its constructive power can change the way we create energy.

Zero Energy Buildings

January 3rd, 2011 by Matt Smolsky No comments »

Here’s a great idea — build office buildings that use zero energy. Sound impossible? Hardly. It’s already becoming a reality (of course, not as fast as we would like).

Zero energy building (ZEB), or net zero energy building, means a building consumes zero net energy and emits zero carbon annually.

The Department of Energy, the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning (ASHRAE), the American Institute of Architects and the National Renewable Energy Lab are taking tangible steps to achieve this goal. The US Department of Energy launched the Net-Zero Energy Commercial Building Initiative in August 2008.

Chris Gaul, a contributor to this blog and engineer at the NREL, sent along an email about the NREL’s recent success with ZEB.

“NREL’s 220,000 square foot “net zero energy” office building is on line with part of its solar panels operational.  The graph below is revealing.  At the 4 PM starting time  the building is occupied and using less than 200 kilowatts.  People go home and during the night power demand drops to less than 150 kilowatts (kW).

“As people arrive at work in the morning demand increases to 225 kW, as expected.  Then demand plummets to less than -50 kW.  An error?  No.  The sun came up.  The rooftop solar panels are generating more electricity than the building needs.  Power is flowing to the grid and the power meter is running backwards.   As daylight ends solar power decreases and the building draws power from the grid at night.

“The trick to net zero energy buildings is to make enough power during the day to balance what is drawn from the grid at night.  NREL is installing more solar (photovoltaic, or PV) panels to achieve this energy balance.”

It’ll be interesting to see how far this can go, and how soon we can start seeing more buildings built to use zero energy.

Zero Energy Buildings

Zero Energy graph from NREL

Chilean Miners

October 13th, 2010 by Matt Smolsky No comments »

What an incredible story. First, the Chilean miners are trapped in a cave in. Bad enough. Then, it’s 17 days before they’re found. Can you imagine the unfathomable fear and anxiety?

After that, they were told there’d be no rescue until Christmas. The mine collapsed on August 5th. So they’re thinking, “5 months cooped up in a dark cave, and a rescue of this type has never occurred before?” Some of us give up hope when we can’t get a dinner reservation. Yet, these guys didn’t. It’s been a story of faith, strength and endurance.

Oh, they had their fearsome, black moments, no doubt. But watching these guys come up, hearing about their solidarity (apparently there was no shortage of volunteers to be rescued last) … it’s been one of the greatest events I’ve ever witnessed.

From dark terror to hope fulfilled. Most of us live in between those extremes, and should be glad about that. But we all have experienced our own crises. The example set by these miners is one to remember. Their faith literally carried them through the storm. It’s a story that’s captured the attention of the world, and for good reason — it’s a story that shows the best of the human spirit in the worst of situations.

Sunny days ahead for solar energy

September 20th, 2010 by Matt Smolsky No comments »

Passing along some encouraging news about renewable energy …

Solar power keeps getting more cost efficient. First Solar of Tempe, AZ, says they’ve broken the $1/watt photovoltaic (PV) module cost barrier. By 2014 they expect PV modules to cost $580/kilowatt, or 58¢/watt.

Balance of system costs, which is everything except modules, is projected to be $950/kilowatt for utility scale projects. PV modules will represent less than half the cost of a solar power plant.

It’s a huge improvement. In 2008, 1,000-kilowatt size solar plants cost $5/watt.

First Solar says they’ll sell power form their projects for 10¢ – 12¢ per kilowatt-hour.

So what does it mean? Heck if I know. I’m not an engineer. But it sure sounds like things are headed in the right direction on the green front.

And after a summer of watching Texas Tea spill into the Gulf of Mexico, I’ll take all the good news about green energy that I can get.

More here

The Ultimate Computer

July 18th, 2010 by Chris Gaul No comments »

In the 60′s and 70′s there were movies about powerful computers coming to life and destroying people.  Star Trek had “The Ultimate Computer” that Captain Kirk talked to death.  2001: A Space Odyssey had the HAL 9000 that thought it knew better than the astronauts and started killing them.   A few years later was  Colussus:  The Forbin Project where a super computer is put in control of America’s nuclear arsenal to eliminate irrational human actions.  It links up with a Soviet computer designed for the same purpose and enslaves mankind under the threat of nuclear holocaust.  In 1979 the film War Games had a weapons control computer WOPR that learned nuclear war was unwinnable.

These movies have dropped off since computers have become ubiquitous to daily life.  Any evil is due to human misuse of a tool, not a silicon conscience.

Which brings us to the point. Ultimate computers do not remain ultimate for long.  Today’s most powerful computer will be a punchline at a computer convention in 5 years.  “You’ve got one of those?  My cell phone has more capability!”

Computer power is measured in floating point operations per second, or flops. A Teraflop is a trillion flops.  Powerful data center computers used by Google and credit card companies use run 100′s of Teraflops.  Just as home computer power progressed from Kilo to Mega to Giga, super computers are jumping from Tera to Peta.  A quadrillion flops.

What does one do with such a computer?
For one, chemical reactions can be simulated in a computer.  Not adding baking soda to vinegar reactions, but vastly complex reactions such as adding an enzyme to a carbohydrate to create a sugar that can be fermented into ethanol.  Instead of running numerous test-tube trials to find the best result it can be done in a computer much faster. I do not know how these reactions are turned into mathematical equations and computer code but they are.

My employer, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), is planning a super computer and being the Department of Energy prime Save Energy Lab its goal is to be the most energy efficient data center in the world.

An IBM representative explained the rapid progress in the last few years.

2005:  100 Teraflops; 34 computer servers, 10,000 square feet, 3,400 kilowatts electric load. (A kilowatt will run an average American house.)

2008:  100 Teraflops;  8 servers, 2,500 square feet, 875 kilowatts

2011:  100 Teraflops:  1 server, 800 square feet, 175 kilowatts

While space and power needs have decreased the hunger for more computing capacity is limitless.  With every generation more computing power is packed into the same computer room.  Less energy is used for each flop but the equipment is packed denser and denser.  A single computer server that once used 5 kW now uses 60.  The limit is cooling the microprocessor.  Home computers use fans.  Super computers use cooling water piped right to the chip.  The 175 kW server is an 8 foot cube yet it produces enough waste heat to warm 8 large houses on a cold winter day. There is no way to blow enough air over the chip to cool it.  Like a car engine, it needs a radiator.

When NREL first discussed its computer with IBM, Hewlett-Packard, Dell, and Cray in 2007 they said our proposed 400 Teraflop computer would be in the top 12 in the world.  Yes, but we won’t actually get it until 2012.  Oh, by then 400 Teraflop wouldn’t make the top 100 list.

NREL is building a new research facility
to study integrating large amounts of renewable energy onto the electric grid. It will open in 2012.  Part of the project is $12 million for a  super computer.  NREL will wait until the last moment to get the latest generation machine.  Once in place it will busily sort 400 trillion 1′s and 0′s every second.  It will toil for a few years and then be replaced with a Petaflop-scale machine.  That machine will run a few years and be replaced a yet more powerful computer.

In the future veteran NREL computer guys will be telling stories about when this super computer center opened in 2012 it had 400 Teraflops “and we thought that was really something!” A young new hire will snort, “Teraflops?  You’re kidding me.  My cell phone has more power than that!”